Kolmogorov theorem and classical perturbation theory
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Diagrammatic Methods in Classical Perturbation Theory
Hamiltonian system LetA ⊆ R be an open set andH :A×R×R → R be a smooth function (A×R is called the phase space). Consider the system of ordinary differential equations q̇k = ∂H(q, p, t)/∂pk, ṗk = −∂H(q, p, t)/∂qk, for k = 1, . . . , d. The equations are called Hamilton equations, and H is called a Hamiltonian function. A dynamical system described by Hamilton equations is called a Hamiltonian sy...
متن کاملLindstedt Series and Kolmogorov Theorem
the KAM theorem from a combinatorial viewpoint. Lindstedt, Newcomb and Poincaré introduced a remarkable trigonometric series motivated by the analysis of the three body problem, [P]. In modern language, [G2], it is the generating function, that I call Lindstedt series here, ~h(~ ψ) = ∑∞ k=1 ε k~h(k)(~ ψ) of the sequence ~h(k)(~ ψ) of trigonometric polynomials associated with well known combinat...
متن کاملKolmogorov Theorem Revisited
Kolmogorov Theorem on the persistence of invariant tori of real analytic Hamiltonian systems is revisited. In this paper we are mainly concerned with the lower bound on the constant of the Diophantine condition required by the theorem. From the existing proofs in the literature, this lower bound turns to be ofO(ε1/4), where ε is the size of the perturbation. In this paper, by means of careful (...
متن کاملThe Kolmogorov continuity theorem, Hölder continuity, and the Kolmogorov-Chentsov theorem
Because X is a modification of Y , the right-hand side is a union of finitely many P -null sets, hence is itself a P -null set. A and B each belong to F , so P (A4B) = 0. Because P (A4B) = 0, P (A) = P (B), i.e. P (Xt1 ∈ A1, . . . , Xtn ∈ An) = P (Yt1 ∈ A1, . . . , Ytn ∈ An). 1We have not assumed that (Ω,F , P ) is a complete measure space, so we must verify that a set is measurable before spea...
متن کاملClassical Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov Interpretation
The Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov interpretation explains the meaning of logical operations as operators that construct proofs from proofs of the operands. The BHK interpretation is usually understood as giving intuitionistic interpretation for the logical operators, but, as pointed out by Troelstra and van Dalen [12], it is possible to understand the BHK interpretation classically. We elaborate t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik
سال: 1997
ISSN: 0044-2275
DOI: 10.1007/pl00001475